Fxclearing.com SCAM! – Lambino v COMELEC, G R. No. 174153, October 25, 2006 Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines – FXCL STOLE MONEY!

 

                                                                  Philippines Anti-Cybercrime Police Groupe MOST WANTED PEOPLE List!

 

 

 

#1 Mick Jerold Dela Cruz

Present Address: 1989 C. Pavia St. Tondo, Manila

If you have any information about that person please call

to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines:

Contact Numbers:

Complaint Action Center / Hotline:
Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491
Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083

#2 Gremelyn Nemuco

Present Address; One Rockwell, Makati City

If you have any information about that person please call

to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines:

Contact Numbers:

Complaint Action Center / Hotline:
Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491
Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083

#3 Vinna Vargas

Address: Imus, Cavite 

If you have any information about that person please call

to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines:

Contact Numbers:

Complaint Action Center / Hotline:
Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491
Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083

#4 Ivan Dela Cruz

Present Address: Imus, Cavite

If you have any information about that person please call

to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines:

Contact Numbers:

Complaint Action Center / Hotline:
Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491
Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083

#5 Elton Danao

Permanent Address: 2026 Leveriza, Fourth Pasay, Manila 
Present Address: Naic, Cavite

If you have any information about that person please call

to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines:

Contact Numbers:

Complaint Action Center / Hotline:
Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491
Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083

#6 Virgelito Dada

Present Address: Grass Residences, Quezon City 

If you have any information about that person please call

to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines:

Contact Numbers:

Complaint Action Center / Hotline:
Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491
Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083

#7 John Christopher Salazar

Permanent address: Rivergreen City Residences, Sta. Ana, Manila

If you have any information about that person please call

to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines:

Contact Numbers:

Complaint Action Center / Hotline:
Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491
Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083

#8 Xanty Octavo 

If you have any information about that person please call

to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines:

Contact Numbers:

Complaint Action Center / Hotline:
Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491
Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

#9 Daniel Boco

Address: Imus, Cavite

 

If you have any information about that person please call

to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines:

Contact Numbers:

Complaint Action Center / Hotline:
Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491
Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083

 

 

#10 James Gonzalo Tulabot

Permanent Address: Blk. 4 Lot 30, Daisy St. Lancaster Residences, Alapaan II-A, Imus, Cavite 
Present Address: Pasay City

If you have any information about that person please call

to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines:

Contact Numbers:

Complaint Action Center / Hotline:
Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491
Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083

#11 Lea Jeanee Belleza

If you have any information about that person please call

to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines:

Contact Numbers:

Complaint Action Center / Hotline:
Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491
Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083

#12 Juan Sonny Belleza

If you have any information about that person please call

to Anti-Cybercrime Department Police of Philippines:

Contact Numbers:

Complaint Action Center / Hotline:
Tel. +63 (8) 723-0401 local 7491
Smart/Viber: +63 961 829 8083

       

 

FXCL SCAM Company Details:

OUTSTRIVE SOLUTIONS PH CALL CENTER SERVICES

OUTSTRIVE SOLUTIONS PH CALL CENTER SERVICES



No amendment under this section shall be authorized within five years following the ratification of this Constitution nor oftener than once every five years thereafter.”90 Compliance with these requirements is clearly a justiciable and not a political question. Be that as it may, how the issue will be resolved by the people is addressed to them and to them alone. Following these guidelines, I submit that the stare decisis rule should not bar the reexamination of Santiago. On the factor of intolerability, the six justices in Santiago held R.A. 6735 to be insufficient as it provided no standard to guide COMELEC in issuing its implementing rules. 6735 is insufficient but without striking it down as unconstitutional is an intolerable aberration, the only one of its kind in our planet.

He said that he would like Filipino rice and corn mill operators to make good in their business and that he did not want the government to compete against them. Two separate delegations called to present petitions for the revocation of Department Order No. 5 issued by Education Secretary Gregorio Hernandez, Jr., providing for religious instruction in all public schools, on the ground that it was unconstitutional. One of the delegations was composed of Judge Guillermo Guevara president of The Spirit of 1896, former Justice Roman Ozaeta, and Dean Jorge Bocobo. The other delegation was from the Church of Christ, headed by Gregorio C. Larion. Hereof shall be valid when ratified by a majority of the votes cast in a plebiscite which shall be held not earlier than sixty days nor later than ninety days after the approval of such amendment or revision.

FIRESTONE TIRE V. CA 353 SCRA 601

Lest it be missed, the case at bar involves but a proposal to amend the Constitution. The proposal will still be debated by the people and at this time, there is yet no fail-safe method of telling what will be the result of the debate. There will still be a last step to the process of amendment which is the ratification of the proposal by a majority of the people in a plebiscite called for the purpose. Only when the proposal is approved by a majority of the people in the plebiscite will it become an amendment to the Constitution. It is the people who decide for the people are not an obscure footnote in our Constitution.

PIRMA also urged the Court to reexamine its ruling in Santiago v. COMELEC. 11 The principle of separation of powers operates at the core of a presidential form of government. Thus, legislative power is given to the legislature; executive power, to a separate executive ; and judicial power, to an independent judiciary. The Constitution is a sacred social compact, forged between the government and the people, between each individual and the rest of the citizenry. Through it, the people have solemnly expressed their will that all of them shall be governed by laws, and their rights limited by agreed-upon covenants to promote the common good.

CourseBanking Law (LEB

Bernal complained that after working in the government for about 30 years he was receiving only P200 a month. Bernal thanked the President for his sympathetic understanding of his request. The Cabinet will meet at a special session Friday to act finally on this question and also take up other matters on the agenda left unacted upon. The president met the students at the reception hall, where they “mobbed” him and cheered him, as they sought to shake his hand. He talked to them in Tagalog and said that his interest in the national language could be proved by the fact that he has been using it in his daily conversations with the people who call on him. The students carried placards citing the importance of the national language. December 6.—THE President this day authorized the release of P1,740,238.22 from unexpended balances of the Armed Forces for payment of outstanding obligations for retirement gratuities and gratuities of widows and orphans of officers of the AFP. The presidential committee recommended that cigarette manufacturers be allowed to land raid unload imported Virginia leaf tobacco to the extent of nine million pounds, the estimated deficiency from. The President reiterated at the press conference that in no case will any importation be authorized before January 1, 1956.

In 1989, Ford engineers had documented that a prototype E xplorer has a higher risk of rolling over when the tires are inflated at 30 psi. Therefore, they recommended as a partial antidote to the handling and ride-comfort problems a tire pressure of 26 psi. At this point, the carmaker essentially takes over testing to see how the new tire performs in concert with the entire vehicle, see Figure 3. The testing includes driving the car around test tracks, attaching sensors in the car to test the noise the tire makes, making abrupt stops at high speeds to measure how the tire holds up, and seeing how the car grips the road while zigzagging around cones. Using feedback from the carmaker’s test, the tire manufacturer may tweak the tire.

Third, initiative is a reverse power of and by the people, not of incumbent officials and their machinators. Fourth and most important of all, the signatures must be verified as real and genuine; not concocted, fictitious or fabricated. The only legal way to do this is to enable the Commission on Elections to conduct a nationwide verification process as mandated by the Constitution and the law. Such verification, it bears stressing, is subject to review by this Court. “That term limits may no longer be lifted prior to the 1998 elections via a people’s initiative does not detract one whit from my firm conviction that RA 6735 is sufficient and adequate to implement this constitutional right and, more important, my faith in the power of the people to initiate changes in local and national laws and the Constitution. In fact, I think the Court can deliberate on these two items even more serenely and wisely now that the debates will be free from the din and distraction of the 1998 elections. After all, jurisprudence is not merely for the here and now but, more so, for the hereafter and the morrow. Let me therefore stress, by way of epilogue, my unbending credo in favor of our people’s right to initiative. “In the present case, are PIRMA and its co-petitioners legitimate people’s organizations or are they merely fronts for incumbents who want to extend their terms?

We cannot accept the view of the Solicitor General, in pursuing his theory of non-justiciability, that the question of the President’s authority to propose amendments and the regularity of the procedure adopted for submission of the proposals to the people ultimately lie in the judgment of the latter. Is it not that the people themselves, by their sovereign act, provided for the authority and procedure for the amending process when they ratified the present Constitution in 1973? And, this inquiry must be done a priori not a posteriori, i.e., before the submission to and ratification by the people. The 1973 Constitution in turn underwent a series of significant changes in 1976, 1980, 1981, and 1984. In 1980, the retirement age of seventy for justices and judges was restored.

Top locals brace for tough fight

Thus, in order to breathe life into the constitutional right of the people under a system of initiative to directly propose, enact, approve or reject, in whole or in part, the Constitution, laws, ordinances, or resolution, Congress enacted Republic Act No. 6735. No amount of signatures, not even the 6,327,952 million signatures gathered by the Lambino Group, can change our Constitution contrary to the specific modes that the people, in their sovereign capacity, prescribed when they ratified the Constitution. The alternative is an extra-constitutional change, which means subverting the people’s sovereign will and discarding the Constitution. As the ultimate guardian of the Constitution, this Court is sworn to perform its solemn duty to defend and protect the Constitution, which embodies the real sovereign will of the people. It is well established that when a constitution specifies the manner in which it may be amended or revised, it can be altered by those who favor amendments, revision, or other change only through the use of one of the specified means. The constitution itself recognizes that there is a difference between an amendment and a revision; and it is obvious from an examination of the measure here in question that it is not an amendment as that term is generally understood and as it is used in Article IV, Section 1. The document appears to be based in large part on the revision of the constitution drafted by the ‘Commission for Constitutional Revision’ authorized by the 1961 Legislative Assembly, x x x and submitted to the 1963 Legislative Assembly. It failed to receive in the Assembly the two-third’s majority vote of both houses required by Article XVII, Section 2, and hence failed of adoption, x x x. Thus, the present initiative appears merely a preliminary step for further amendments or revisions to be undertaken by the interim Parliament as a constituent assembly. The people who signed the signature sheets could not have known that their signatures would be used to propose an amendment mandating the interim Parliament to propose further amendments or revisions to the Constitution.
fxcl scam scam
The signature sheets were distributed nationwide to affiliated non-government organizations and volunteers of Sigaw ng Bayan, as well as to the local officials. Copies of the draft petition for initiative containing the proposition were also circulated to the local officials and multi-sectoral groups. Pending resolution of the case, the Court issued a temporary restraining order enjoining the COMELEC from proceeding with the Delfin Petition and the Pedrosas from conducting a signature drive for people’s initiative to amend the Constitution. Upon assuming office, each of the justices of the Supreme Court took a solemn oath to uphold the Constitution. Being the protectors of the fundamental law as the highest expression of the sovereign will, they must subject to the strictest scrutiny any attempt to change it, lest it be trivialized and degraded by the assaults of the mob and of ill-conceived designs. The Court must single-mindedly defend the Constitution from bogus efforts falsely attributed to the sovereign people. Which registry of voters will be used to verify the signatures in the petition? This question is relevant considering that under RA 8189, the old registry of voters used in the 1995 national elections was voided after the barangay elections on May 12, 1997, while the new list may be used starting only in the elections of May 1998. The present petition and that in Santiago are materially different from each other. There is thus no cogent reason to frustrate and defeat the present direct action of the people to exercise their sovereignty by proposing changes to their fundamental law.

Updates and Articles on Philippine Law and Jurisprudence

The signature sheets were then submitted to the local election officers for verification based on the voters’ registration record. Upon completion of the verification process, the respective local election officers issued certifications to attest that the signature sheets have been verified. The verified signature sheets were subsequently transmitted to the office of Sigaw ng Bayan for the counting of the signatures. “The Constitution itself sets a time limitation on when changes thereto may be proposed. Section 2 of Article XVII precludes amendments “within five years following ratification x x x nor oftener than once every five years thereafter.” Since its ratification, the 1987 Constitution has never been amended. Hence, the five-year prohibition is now inoperative and amendments may theoretically be proposed at any time. “It took only one million people to stage a peaceful revolution at EDSA, and the very rafters and foundations of the martial law society trembled, quaked and crumbled.
Following Justice Puno’s clear demonstration why Santiago should not be respected as precedent, I agree that the COMELEC’s failure to take cognizance of the petitions as mandated by Rep. Act No. 6735 constitutes grave abuse of discretion correctible through the petitions before this Court. I only write separately to highlight a few other points which also inform my vote to grant the petitions. 36 Section 9 – The proposition in an initiative on the Constitution approved by a majority of the votes cast in the plebiscite shall become effective as to the day of the plebiscite. “Revision” and “amendment” have the common characteristics of working changes in the charter, and are sometimes used in exactly the same sense but there is an essential difference between them. stole my money 109 Only fourteen justices participated in the deliberations as Justice Teodoro R. Padilla took no part on account of his relationship with the lawyer of one of the parties. I relied only to the assurances of the people who are volunteering that they are going to reproduce the signature sheets as well as the draft petition that we have given them, Your Honor. “It is a Constitution we are expounding” solemnly intoned the great Chief Justice John Marshall of the United States in the 1819 case of M’cCulloch v. Maryland.129 Our Constitution is not a mere collection of slogans. Every syllable of our Constitution is suffused with significance and requires our full fealty. Indeed, the rule of law will wither if we allow the commands of our Constitution to underrule us.
Top locals brace for tough fight
A person gave the information that only the other day, four persons whom he thought were Huks met him and asked for cigarettes. The delegation also informed the President that as a result of the last elections in the city, out of the 12 positions disputed, one Liberal and one, Democrat have been elected councilors while the Nacionalistas were able to elect eight councilors together with the mayor and the vice-mayor. THE PRESIDENT today conferred with Ambassador Felino Neri, chief Philippine reparations negotiator, on the latest news reports from Japan on the reparations question. No announcement was made after the conference, but it was learned that in addition to discussing the war debts issue, the President and Neri reviewed the entire field of Philippine-Japan relations in the light of these press dispatches. The presidential committee headed by NEC Chairman Alfredo Montelibano reached an estimate of next year’s deficiency after canvassing all provincial governors of tobacco-growing provinces on their respective stock positions. The governors have reported that their local tobacco products suitable for cigarette manufacture have already been bought. Customs Commissioner Manuel P. Manahan, who accompanied the group, informed the President that the conference, which was the first ever held by customs collectors, was for the purpose of discussing the effective implementation of new laws like the No-Dollar Import Law and the Laurel-Langley Trade Agreement.

Another day at the office

In the span of three years, foreign firms have acquired Firestone, Uniroyal, B. G oodrich and G eneral tire each a household name for half a century . In the early 1970’s Bridgestone of Japan began exporting radial tires to the US. In the decades prior to the introduction of radial tires, Firestone Tire and Rubber was viewed by some observers as the best managed US tire company. Firestone’s crash involvement in radials contributed to quality problems with the Firestone 500 radial tire, which resulted in the costliest recalls in history, and delays in closing bias tire plants brought the company closer to bankruptcy than any of its competitors.
OPINION: Who’s to Blame for the Tire Blowout at NLEX?
Firestone says sometimes Philippines courts will say a trial is public, but then anyone who isn’t directly connected to the case will be turned away. Embassy officials are expected to attend the trial with the intention of demonstrating the government’s commitment to her case. A fair and true report, made in good faith, without any comments or remarks, of any judicial, legislative or other official proceedings which are not of confidential nature, or of any statement, report or speech delivered in said proceedings, or of any other act performed by public officers in the exercise of their functions. The ties that bound the two companies were knotted more tightly when Harvey Firestone’s granddaughter married William Clay Ford, Henry Ford’ grandson. The US tire industry provides a striking example of market dominance lost in the face of aggressive foreign competition and technological change. After French tire manufacturer Michelin introduced radial tires in the late 1960 most US tire makers suffered costly setbacks while trying to close the technological gap and lost significant market share. Of the five original firms in the 1930s by 1988 only G oodyear remained an independent tire company.

  • The document appears to be based in large part on the revision of the constitution drafted by the ‘Commission for Constitutional Revision’ authorized by the 1961 Legislative Assembly, x x x and submitted to the 1963 Legislative Assembly.
  • This evenly divided vote resulted in the affirmance of the validity of the statute but did not constitute a binding precedent on the Court.
  • As aforestressed, that ruling of six justices who do not represent the majority lacks precedential status and is non-binding on the present petitioners.

So this is a third avenue that we are providing for the implementation of what is now popularly known as people’s power. In other words, Mr. Speaker, in Section 1 of Article VI which describes legislative power, there are reserved powers given to the people. In Section 32, we are specifically told to pass at the soonest possible time a bill on referendum and initiative. We are specifically mandated to share the legislative powers of Congress with the people. The legislative power shall be vested in the Congress of the Philippines which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives, except to the extent reserved to the people by the provision on initiative and referendum. The Santiago ruling of 19 March 1997 is not applicable to the instant petition for initiative filed by the petitioners.

Laat een reactie achter

Het e-mailadres wordt niet gepubliceerd. Vereiste velden zijn gemarkeerd met *